SoBold logo

Measure and track the exposure window for vulnerabilities on your firm’s website

For regulated investment and financial services firms, the website is often the one public-facing system that sits outside the controls applied to everything else. Our Vulnerability Tracker shows the vulnerabilities disclosed across the technologies your website runs on, and how many could be exploited remotely.

Vulnerability tracker

Set the clock

XX:XX:XX UTC

In the last 30 days:

Sep XX, XXXX → Oct XX, XXXX · 30 days of public disclosure

-

CVEs were published

- MIN

Average time between CVE disclosures

Figures are drawn from public vulnerability data and updated once a day. The Vulnerability Tracker does not scan any website and does not store anything entered.

Exposure cascade

Everything published, narrowed to what an attacker can actually reach and exploit

-

CVEs published

-

Externally exploitable

-

Added to CISA KEV

-

Externally exploitable KEVs

Over 30 days, - vulnerabilities in internet-reachable systems were discovered. Of these, - are known to be exploited by threat actors.

Filter by technology

Explore the number of exposures in the last 30 days by vendor, application or service.

- CVEs mention “” · - externally exploitable · - in CISA KEV

CVE Severity Flags Date Description
No CVEs match “”.

Want to know what’s exposed on your site?

Schedule a consultation

Top exposures exploited

The most critical exploited exposures in the last 30 days

No critical exploited vulnerabilities in the last 30 days.

The importance of website security in the financial services and investment sector

A compromised website can expose investor data, undermine due diligence and draw regulatory attention to the firm’s wider operational resilience.

The top WordPress vulnerabilities in 2026: what the latest Wordfence data tells us

Investor and LP data

Investor portals, data rooms and gated content hold LP details, fund documents and capital account information, which makes them a high-value target for credential theft and data exfiltration.

Operational resilience

Regulators such as the FCA expect firms to keep important business services within impact tolerances, and the EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) extends that scrutiny to ICT third-party providers such as web agencies and hosts.

Operational due diligence

LPs and allocators use due diligence questionnaires to assess a manager’s cyber controls, including how internet-facing systems are patched and tested, so the website’s security forms part of the fundraising process.

Impersonation and payment fraud

Compromised websites and lookalike domains can be used to impersonate firms in investment and payment diversion fraud, damaging trust with investors.

What an optimal patching posture looks like for financial services and investment websites

Websites and platforms need to be held to the same vulnerability management standard as any other internet-facing system. That means monitoring vulnerability feeds at least daily, patching to a fixed monthly baseline and addressing high and critical vulnerabilities as soon as they are disclosed.

Our Cyber Shield SLA delivers this standard across every site we manage, with real-time vulnerability monitoring and between-cycle patching at no additional cost, giving security teams records they can include in their wider assurance reporting.

Websites typically sit outside a firm’s security perimeter

Security investment in financial services is rightly focused on core infrastructure and the systems that hold client and fund data, while the public website is often managed by marketing or investor relations teams or an external agency. 

Websites typically run third-party code and represent the firm publicly, so an unpatched vulnerability carries reputational and regulatory consequences out of proportion to its technical scope.

SoBold’s Vulnerability Tracker brings disclosures across the technologies websites run on into view, giving IT and security teams the visibility to bring the website into the same vulnerability management programme as the rest of the firm.

What the Vulnerability Tracker can't show

Code Audit service

The Vulnerability Tracker counts disclosures across the selected technologies, while a code audit checks what is actually installed on a site against them.

Code Audits

Related news

Agency

SoBold joins the Harbour Collective

Will Newland

2 min read
Security

What Wordfence’s September 2026 WordPress malware report means for enterprise sites

Sam Phillips

8 min read
Security Enterprise

The top WordPress vulnerabilities in 2026: what the latest Wordfence data tells us

Will Newland

7 min read
AI SEO Healthcare, Life Sciences & MedTech

Building LLM visibility for B2B healthtech businesses

Will Newland

5 min read

FAQs on the Vulnerability Tracker data

Will Newland - SoBold founder

Get in touch with Will for more answers.

020 3137 8596 hello@soboldltd.com

Vulnerability data is published by technology rather than by sector, so the tracker filters by default to technologies commonly found across energy and infrastructure web platforms. Clearing the filter shows every disclosure in the selected date range.

The tracker shows public disclosure data rather than the patch status of a specific site, so it doesn’t replace evidence of patching or testing. 

Clients on our Cyber Shield SLA receive reporting on patching activity that can support DDQ responses alongside penetration test results.

Patching and deployments are scheduled around closed periods and the wider financial calendar, with critical vulnerabilities handled through an agreed emergency process.